|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knee surgery is not new - there is
evidence which suggests that the ancient Egyptians operated
on the knee joint, but probably for trauma, rather than for
joint diseases. Joint surgery on the knee really began in
the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and
prosthetic knee joint replacements appeared just after the
end of the Second World War. In 1947, Shiers, a British
Orthopaedic Surgeon, developed the first true knee joint
replacement, which was a simple hinge joint, pivoting around
a central pin.
From this early design, other
hinged types of knee prostheses evolved, but they all functioned in much the
same way as a basic hinge joint, with no attempt made to
replicate the motion of a normal knee. This was primarily
because there was little knowledge of the way in which a
physiologically normal knee moves. The knee rotates as it
moves from extension into flexion and
also pivots about the medial side.
|
|
 |
|
The Modern
Knee Replacement
The forebear of the first
generation of modern knee designs was introduced in the late
1960's by Gunston, at Wrightington Hospital in Lancashire.
The Gunston Knee was the first knee joint to have a
metal to plastic articulation. Next
came the Total Condylar Knee,
designed by an English Surgeon, John Insall, working at the
Hospital for Special Surgery in New York, closely followed
by an improved design, the Insall Burstein Knee. Virtually
all knee replacements are based on these two designs
and look remarkably similar,
although competing claims are made regarding their efficacy.
In the mid- to late-1980's, some problems began to be seen
with these earlier designs, with prosthetic loosenings,
damage to bone stock and difficult revision surgery.
All modern knee designs are
effectively a compromise between congruency,
(making
the components fit together as well as possible) and freedom
of movement, which will tend to minimise the forces imparted
to the prosthetic knee. These two conditions are, in the
prosthetic knee, almost mutually exclusive.
Fixed bearing knees can and do
provide excellent long-term results but, as the mean age of
knee replacement patients decreases, the results tend to
worsen, probably because younger, fitter patients will place
greater demands on their replaced knees than older, less
active patients.
The
Solution
Are there any solutions to these
problems? Fortunately, there are and, in the late 1970's,
John Goodfellow, a Surgeon, and John O'Connor, a
bio-engineer, both working in Oxford, developed
a knee which
was
dramatically different to any preceding design of knee
joint. Firstly, it was fully congruent and, secondly, it was
unconstrained, as the plastic component moved freely between
the femoral and tibial components. This knee has been shown
to have excellent long-term clinical results; however, as it
is designed to replace only one half of a knee joint, its
applicability is somewhat limited. |
|
|
|
|
|
In 1976-1977, Polyzoides, in
Solihull, and Beuchel, in New Jersey, developed two similar
products, both of which permitted rotation of the femur on the tibia and more
physiologically normal movement than fixed bearing knees.
In the last few
years, there has been
a big swing towards the use of mobile bearing knees and the Rotaglide Mobile Bearing Knee
* (Corin) has the longest
clinical history of any total condylar type of knee which
permits both rotation and front-to-back movement. It may be
considered as a fourth generation knee replacement and
provides more normal movement for a replaced knee than the
older, fixed bearing designs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Rotaglide Knee * |
|
|
|
|
|
One of the keys to implant
longevity is minimising the production of polyethylene wear
particles, as the body's defences can react to
such debris and speed prosthetic loosening. How can this be
best achieved? The easy answer would be to remove
polyethylene from the prosthetic knee, but this is, as yet,
not possible. However, if the knee is as congruent as
possible, fewer wear particles will be produced because the
high contact areas resulting from the high conformity mean
that there will be low contact stresses and thus the chances
of damaging the polyethylene are significantly reduced. The Rotaglide Knee has spherical, distal and posterior femoral
condyles, articulating with polyethylene meniscal
components, which have spherical contact areas of the same
radius as the condyles of the femoral component.
This feature, combined with the
ability of the meniscal bearings to rotate 12.5º either side
of the midline of the tibial tray and to move up to 5mm
anteriorly and posteriorly, means that congruency is
maintained throughout the range of movement. In turn, this
means that high contact areas of metal on polyethylene are
maintained, thus yielding contact stresses well below those
which are likely to cause material damage.
*
|
|
 |
|
It has
been shown that knee replacements work as well as hip
replacements, at least in the relatively elderly patient
population and the challenge now is to extend this success
to the younger, higher demand patient.
Mobile bearing knee replacements
are becoming increasingly widely used as the surgical
community accepts the benefits that these devices are likely
to provide, but few devices currently available have much
clinical history. Virtually every orthopaedic device
manufacturer has introduced a mobile bearing knee within the
last five years, recognising the need to be able to offer
younger patients a long-term solution for their joint
disease.
Knee replacements in the 21st
century will increasingly be of the mobile bearing type and
the Rotaglide Knee is a clinically proven and extensively
tested design, which has been shown to have excellent
mid-term results, with 99% survivorship at
five to eight
years. 1 It has the longest clinical history of any total condylar mobile bearing meniscal knee which provides both
rotation and antero-posterior movement and offers the more
active patient the possibility of long lasting knee
replacement. |
|
|
|
|
|
* The Rotaglide
Mobile Bearing Knee is not cleared or approved for use in
the USA |
|
1 A.
Hudd, K. Kunasingham, D. Ricketts, J. Bush: 'A 5 to 8 year
follow-up stud of the Rotaglide mobile bearing total knee
arthroplasty', International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 2008. |
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
|
|